________________________
_______________________________
________________________
_______________________________
English: The Seal of the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation. For more information, see here. Español: El escudo del Buró Federal de Investigaciones (FBI). Para obtener más información, véase aquí (Inglés). (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
SANTA ANA, CA—The CEO of an Orange County-based mortgage banking and financial services firm was sentenced today to 41 months in federal prison for operating a Ponzi scheme that collected more than $6.7 million from more than two dozen victims, announced Andrė Birotte, Jr., the United States Attorney in Los Angeles, and Bill L. Lewis, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office.
David Lee Hardin, Jr., 59, of Coto De Caza, who is the CEO and majority shareholder of a group of companies including Covenant Mortgage, Covenant Marketing, Covenant Debt Solutions, Covenant Insurance, and HRE Mortgage, was sentenced by United States District Judge James V. Selna. In addition to the prison term, Judge Selna ordered Hardin to pay $1.5 million in restitution. Judge Selna noted that such investment fraud schemes are prevalent in the Orange County area and that Mr. Hardin’s sentence was meant to serve as a deterrent to others.
Hardin pleaded guilty in March 2013 to mail fraud, admitting that his victims suffered losses of approximately $1.5 million.
From April 2007 through July 2010, Hardin solicited investments in a side venture related to his companies’ mortgage business. The investments were structured as loans to Hardin’s companies at fixed rates of interest. Hardin told the investors that their funds would be used to finance a home building project, to originate mortgages, and to fund his debt settlement business and that returns would be generated through home sales and fees from mortgage originations and debt settlement services. In reality, Hardin used a large percentage of the funds to make purported “interest” payments to earlier rounds of investors, in the typical pattern of a Ponzi scheme. He used other funds for personal expenses, including rent and car payments. Still other funds were used for operational costs of Hardin’s other businesses, including employee salaries and operating costs.
The criminal case against Hardin is the result of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Sooooo, did the feds look into the mortgage practices of Hardin’s companies for any fraud that may cause taxpayers liability with FNM?
Or did they assume he was only a “criminal” in one aspect of his business life?
Simply want to say your article is as amazing.
The clearness on your submit is simply cool and that i
could assume you are a professional on this subject.
Well along with your permission let me to seize your feed to
keep up to date with impending post. Thank you a million and please carry on the
rewarding work.
my website – seo Google – google.com –