Sample Ad Code Sample Ad Code Sample Ad Code

Socialize

BREAKING: Norwalk Facing Fiscal Crisis From Utility User Tax Lawsuit

 By Randy Economy
Two local residents have put Norwalk city officials on notice that they plan to legally challenge the merits of a long instituted Utility User’s Tax and are demanding millions of dollars of collected revenue be immediately returned to taxpayers.
Residents Alfred Gonzalez and David Reynoso, who reside together at a home on the 10600 block of Downey-Norwalk Road informed Norwalk city council members in a written correspondence back on March 21 they are seeking “immediate cessation” of the controversial UUT.
Gonzalez and Reynoso are being represented by a San Diego based law firm Marks Finch and specifically by the legal groups partner Louis Blum.
Hews Media Group-Community Newspaper was sent a copy of the notification several weeks ago, and published the document on line on Wednesday.
Blum said that Norwalk officials broke federal laws after the Internal Revenue Service ruled in 2006 that the tax does not apply to toll telephone service where the “charge varies only by time and not by distance.”
The challenge to the Norwalk UUT has sent top city administrators including City Manager Michael Egan scrambling during the past several weeks to construct a plan to counter the lawsuit.
On Tuesday, Egan met with reporters throughout Southeast Los Angeles County in his city hall conference room to talk about the situation.
Egan said that the current members of the city council have not made a “formal decision” on how to handle the situation, but that the item will be discussed openly at a Norwalk City Council meeting on July 15.
Egan confirmed that he hired a private Santa Monica based political consulting firm to conduct an aggressive telephone survey to 377 Norwalk voters this past month to weigh voter opinions about a possible November 2014 ballot measure regarding the situation. HMG-CN was provided a copy of the three-page summary of the survey that was conducted by Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz and Associates.
The firm, also known as FM3, stated in a memo to Egan and other city officials on June 24th that the poll “found significant support for a potential City Utility Users Tax measure to update an existing, outdated ordinance so all taxpayers are treated fairly regardless of the technology used, with no increase in current tax rates.”
The survey indicated that 70 percent of respondents indicated that they would support the measure on the November 2014 ballot. Egan said that the measure would require a simple majority vote of 50 percent, plus one to be approved.
Egan did not want to specifically address the contents or merits of the correspondence of Gonzalez and Reynoso. Nevertheless, he did acknowledge that if the lawsuit prevails, the city of Norwalk could lose at least $2 million annually.
“Everything is on the table. I am not saying that any one department would be hit harder than any other but if this happens, it would be another devastating blow to our city finances,” Egan said.
Gonzalez and Reynoso are stating in their complaint that they are taking their action “on behalf of themselves sand all similarly situated taxpayers in the City of Norwalk.”
Both are “respectfully requesting the immediate cessation of collection of the illegal and unlawful UUT on these services and return of all monies to the persons and entities from whom the UUT was collected on those services. “
Alfred Gonzalez has been a customer of H20 Wireless, Metro PCS and Sprint, while David Reynoso is a customer of Metro PCS and previously Sprint and Nextel.
They claim that Norwalk city officials are “able to determine the identities of all relevant taxpayers and the specific movies due to each of them; however, upon information and belief the total amount exceeds $10,000.”
Egan said he has never heard directly from Gonzalez or Reynoso in the past.
“We have no idea who they are, and have never had any interaction with them here at city hall, as far as we can determine,” Egan said.

Comments

comments

Powered by Facebook Comments

7 Responses to BREAKING: Norwalk Facing Fiscal Crisis From Utility User Tax Lawsuit

  1. Smitty Reply

    July 9, 2014 at 7:29 pm

    This is nothing LA diverts over 100,000,000 a year to its general fund, on top of the city utility tax, plus they defer maintenance to pocket that loot too.

    • David Lauderdale Reply

      July 10, 2014 at 8:34 am

      Smitty, If that is supposed to make me feel better… It aint working.. I have my hands full in Norwalk..

  2. David Lauderdale Reply

    July 7, 2014 at 10:28 am

    Think back .. Back to the origin of the Utility Tax ..
    The UUT was illegally implemented from it’s origin.
    Only after threat of a lawsuit was it placed on a ballot before the voters, with the ominous threat of “The sky is falling, we couldn’t possibly return all of the money we have received (say STOLEN) if the voters don’t pass it”
    And here we are again, only with threat of another lawsuit is it being considered for a ballot vote as “modernization” .
    However there may indeed be a more serious pattern at work here.
    Mike Egan implements a New Sewer tax during his tenure in Bellflower.
    Mike Egan raised the Utility User Tax during his tenure in Bellflower.
    Mike Egan comes to Norwalk and implements a New Sewer Tax.
    Mike Egan comes to Norwalk and increases our Utility User Tax.
    It certainly seems to me Mr. Egan is doing exactly what he was hired by the Norwalk City Council to do.
    Increase revenues (say Taxes) for the city council to continue their out of control spending habits.
    Unfortunately for the residents of Norwalk, but perhaps to the credit of Mr. Egan, he has proven to be very good at his job.
    What Mr. Egan and the City Council don’t seem to be very good at is living within a budget. Even after increasing the 2014-2015 budget in excess of 20 million dollars and virtually in the very next breath declare a “Fiscal Emergency.”
    I have spoken at length on several occasions to this City Council regarding what I consider irresponsible and entitlement spending when attention should be prioritized to essential necessities of the city. At the conclusion of each presentation I ask “ Are you listening now” The simple fact remains, this City Council is not listening and does not listen.
    I certainly plan to address the City Council once again at the July 15th meeting.
    D. Lauderdale
    I would love to see the chambers again packed in opposition to this newest tax increase.

  3. Ms. Jones Reply

    July 7, 2014 at 9:14 am

    “There’s a natural law of karma that vindictive people, who go out of their way to hurt others, will end up broke and alone.”

    Sylvester Stallone

  4. Ms. Jones Reply

    July 7, 2014 at 9:12 am

    There’s a natural law of karma that vindictive people, who go out of their way to hurt others, will end up broke and alone.

    Sylvester Stallone

  5. John Paul Drayer Reply

    July 3, 2014 at 10:18 pm

    Mr. Egan had to extend the utility tax in Bellflower in an election as well , when he was the city manager. However no money was returned to taxpayers for over payment.

    • Ms. Jones Reply

      July 7, 2014 at 9:45 am

      Either Mr. Egan is showing his ambivalence to what is happening or he seems to thinks he could cover the sun with his finger. He always hides behind the trenches and allows his directors and the City council to make revolting decisions. He is a clone of the former City manager, Ernie Garcia.

      Mr. Louis Blum will make sure this time the City pays back every dollar. The City top administrators need to learn to show fairness & justice and stop their greed with giving themselves higher wages, driving city cars home (over 60 miles each way, free gas, free insurance & free auto repair). They are taking advantage of our hard earned money & taxes. Every Director makes over 150 thousand dollars with benefits and retirement. To solve the problem they want to increase our utility tax.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>